Thursday, November 24, 2005

Michael the Archangel


Here is one paradox which the WT cannot resolve for me - just one of many! They teach that Jesus was previously - and also now - known as Michael, the created archangel. But it is a simple matter to prove from Scripture, that this cannot be so. Who is the "man" talking with Daniel in chapters 10 & 12? “... here was a certain man clothed in linen, with his hips girded with gold of Uphaz. And his body was like chrysolite, and his face like the appearance of lightning, and his eyes like fiery torches, and his arms and the place of his feet were like the sight of burnished copper, and the sound of his words was like the sound of a crowd.”

When he saw this "man", Daniel fell unconscious, and the "man" told him not to be afraid, and helped him to his feet. Whoever he is, he has these things to say about Michael - "But the prince of the royal realm of Persia was standing in opposition to me for twenty-one days, and, look! Michael, one of the foremost princes, came to help me...And now I shall go back to fight with the prince of Persia. When I am going forth, look! also the prince of Greece is coming. However, I shall tell you the things noted down in the writing of truth, and there is no one holding strongly with me in these things but Michael, the prince of you people…And during that time Michael will stand up, the great prince who is standing in behalf of the sons of your people. And there will certainly occur a time of distress such as has not been made to occur since there came to be a nation until that time. And during that time your people will escape, every one who is found written down in the book. And there will be many of those asleep in the ground of dust who will wake up, these to indefinitely lasting life and those to reproaches and to indefinitely lasting abhorrence."

We see this same man speaking with John in Revelation chapter 1 - "I heard behind me a strong voice like that of a trumpet ... in the midst of the lampstands someone like a son of man, clothed with a garment that reached down to the feet, and girded at the breasts with a golden girdle. Moreover, his head and his hair were white as white wool, as snow, and his eyes as a fiery flame; and his feet were like fine copper when glowing in a furnace; and his voice was as the sound of many waters."

When he saw this "man", John fell unconscious, and the "man" told him not to fear, and raised him to his feet. "Do not be fearful. I am the First and the Last, and the living one; and I became dead, but, look! I am living forever and ever ... " This time, we are left in no doubt at all as to who this "man" is. He identifies himself as Jesus. His characteristics prove that he is the very same "man" who spoke with Daniel, and who said that Michael was just "one of the chief princes", who "came to help him", whom he "left behind with the king of Persia" (as stated in translations other than the NWT.) So, since it is Jesus speaking with Daniel, about Michael in the 3rd person - it is obvious that Michael cannot be Jesus. Jesus is superior to Michael, who is simply "one of the chief princes" and I take this to mean, that he is one of the 7 chief angels Jesus is holding (as stars) in his hand in Revelation 1. In fact, Jesus says that Michael is the chief prince of the Israelites - in both Daniel 12, and Revelation 12.

I would be very interested in your response to this. Other JWs I speak to have been unable to grasp the simple logic of reading the plain evidence of Scripture for themselves, but you are different. You can see the danger of formulating a doctrine around a misconception or a verse taken out of context.



There is no mystery who the “man” was that appeared to Daniel. He was the angel Gabriel; the only angel mentioned by name in the entire Bible (other than Michael). How do we know it was Gabriel and not Jesus? Throughout the prophecy of Daniel there are two angels that converse with each other and with Daniel. Consider the 8th chapter where one angel tells Gabriel to approach Daniel and explain the vision to him. Daniel 8:16-19 reads: “And I began to hear the voice of an earthling man in the midst of the Ulai, and he proceeded to call out and say: ‘Gabriel, make that one there understand the thing seen.’ So he came beside where I was standing, but when he came I got terrified so that I fell upon my face. And he proceeded to say to me: ‘Understand, O son of man, that the vision is for the time of the end.’ And while he was speaking with me, I had become fast asleep on my face on the earth. So he touched me and made me stand up where I had been standing. And he went on to say: Here I am causing you to know what will occur in the final part of the denunciation, because it is for the appointed time of the end.’”

Notice please the similarities to the incident you cited in the 10th chapter. In both cases Daniel became terrified by the sight and fell down as if dead. On both occasions the angel revealed prophetic events tied to the time of the end.

In the 9th chapter of Daniel Gabriel appears again and makes mention of the fact he had been made weary with tiredness. Then in the 10th chapter we are informed that the angel had to fight with the demonic prince of Persia—no doubt the reason for Gabriel’s tiredness in his earlier appearance to Daniel. It would appear, then, that the angel in the 10th chapter is also Gabriel—even though he is not named as such.

Lending weight to that is the fact that the angel was successfully opposed by the prince of Persia for three weeks—until Michael came to his assistance. If the angel in the 10th chapter of Daniel had actually been Christ or the Word as he is also called, surely he would have been more powerful than the prince of Persia and Michael. The account suggests otherwise—that the angel of the vision has less authority than Michael. Indeed, the 12th chapter of Revelation indicates that Michael is the most powerful angel in heaven—even taking the lead in ousting the Devil from heaven--yet the angel in the 10th chapter was not able to overcome demonic opposition until Michael came to help.

However, the similarities between the appearance of the angel in Daniel’s prophecy and the appearance of the son of man in Revelation are undeniable. But, keep in mind that Daniel’s encounter with the angel was in the form of a vision. And without doubt the vision was prophetically significant—prefiguring Christ’s parousia. Later on in the encounter the angel took the less imposing form of an earthling man. What accounts for the similarities then? Most likely the angel was playing the role of Christ in the vision. That Gabriel would have that privilege is in keeping with the fact that Gabriel later announced the birth of Jesus.

Since the angel’s appearance took place after Daniel supplicated God for mercy upon Israel and was for the purpose of informing Daniel of what would befall Jehovah’s people during the time of the end, it seems that Daniel’s terrifying encounter with the glorious angel prefigures Jesus’ presence—when he comes alongside the chosen ones to minister to them after they have been disciplined.

Keep in mind that on numerous occasions angels represented Jehovah himself. For example, when Moses had an encounter with God up on top of Mount Sinai, when he received the 10 Commandments, the account says that Moses spoke with God, but 1,500 years later we are told that Moses merely encountered deputized angels who spoke for God. Now, if the angels have authority to speak for Jehovah, it is reasonable to assume that Michael’s angels have authority to speak for him as well.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Friday, February 17, 2006


“Michael the archangel” –Does it mean that there is only one archangel?

Does the Bible’s reference to “Michael the archangel” necessarily mean that there is only one archangel, namely Christ in his role as God’s highest ranking angel, or spirit son? It would appear that there are several archangels as there are numerous seraphs, cherubs and other angels within the hierarchy of God’s spirit sons.

However, it would seem that within each grouping, some take on more of a leadership role than others as representative of the whole group. This could explain why the vast majority of angels do not reveal their names, as they humbly recognize that they owe their “wonderful” name to God. This recognition is part of their sacred service to Jehovah, as they do not support any rivalry against God. –Judges 13:17-18.

Contrary to the rebellious angels, the self-effacing disposition of the faithful angels is reflected all the way up to Christ, in that they refrain from revealing their names among fallen mankind. Although Christ walked among men, he will ultimately reveal himself only to those who stuck with him no matter where he goes. (John 14:19-20) It would appear then that the fact that the Bible mentions the names of only two angels (Michael and Gabriel) substantiates their unity and oneness of goal and purpose in harmony with God’s will.

To illustrate, the board of directors comprise a handful of individuals representing a corporation. Then you may have a chairman that takes the lead among them. But they are all part of the same body of directors.

Some may object however that there is only one archangel, Christ Jesus, as taught by our Watchtower institution. Nevertheless, if we keep in mind that the name “Michael the archangel” is reflective of Christ’s role in relation to all of God’s spirit sons (including his glorified anointed human sons), it becomes clear that this usage of the phrase could be more indicative of their oneness of purpose, and not necessarily meaning that there is one archangel.

In principle, this seems quite apparent in Scripture. For example, when Jehovah was entering into a covenant relationship with the sons of Israel and forming them into a nation, it was in the context that they were not to follow after false gods. Then he said to Moses: “Go up to Jehovah, you and Aaron, Na'dab and A•bi'hu and seventy of the older men of Israel, and YOU must bow down from a distance. And Moses by himself must approach Jehovah; but they should not approach, and the people should not go up with him.”

As can be seen from this account, seventy of the older men of Israel along with, Moses, Aaron, Nadab and Abihu served as representative of the people as intermediaries between God and the people in general. “Then Moses came and related to the people all the words of Jehovah and all the judicial decisions, and all the people answered with one voice and said: “All the words that Jehovah has spoken we are willing to do.”

Notice the organizational arrangement of things as the people responded with one voice in this process of validating their agreement to enter into a covenant relationship with Jehovah. Certainly this act of representation by a few for the many is a divinely approved organizational method that Jehovah utilizes in organizing his intelligent creation. This is very much in keeping with the apostles remark that God is not a God of “disorder, but of peace.” 1 Corinthians 14:33.

We see other examples of this type of organization by representation in God’s arrangement of heavenly Jerusalem in keeping with the model established for ancient Israel. Any deviation from God’s organizational plans produces rebellion and can result in the worship of false gods, and this is precisely what Jehovah warned Moses about as he was about to form them into nation.

So while “Michael the archangel” is a reference to Christ, it may not necessarily mean that there is only one archangel. But rather the usage of the phrase may lend itself to the harmony that exist among all of God’s spirit sons as they lovingly and willingly submit to Christ’s headship. However, it is clear in Scripture that God has appointed only Christ, “the first born of all creation,” as “King of kings” and heir of all things. In that sense, Christ’s position is unique among all of God’s intelligent creation. --Colossians 1:15, 16.

CG